• <code id="82ven"></code>

    <tt id="82ven"></tt>
    <small id="82ven"><delect id="82ven"><noscript id="82ven"></noscript></delect></small>
  • <tt id="82ven"><pre id="82ven"></pre></tt>
    用户名   密码

    当前位置首页社区国外译帖美国美国网民热议今年谁会对抗中国
    看世界译帖
    美国

    美国网民热议今年谁会对抗中国


    Who Will Stand Up to China This Year?
    译者unknown     发?#38469;?#38388;2016-04-29     超过 0 位网友阅读

    九段线是实际存在的事实就像你自己也说的即使是菲律宾也承认其存在

    原文地址http://www.nationalinterest.org


    The growth of the South China Sea as a primary area of concern of the U.S.-Japan alliance, second perhaps only to the Korean nuclear threat, is one of the main trends of the past four years. The East China Sea, once a serious concern, has receded in the background as China—under Xi Jinping’s direction—has turned its attention and focus on securing Chinese pre-eminence inside the Nine-Dashed Line. This coming spring, the Philippines’ court case on the legality of this line will be decided by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague. By many accounts, and by the weaknesses inherent in China’s claims, the finding is likely to be in Manila’s favor.

    作为美日联盟主要关注地区的中国南海局势的发展其受关注程度大概仅仅只是次于朝?#23454;?#26680;威胁是过去四年中的一个主要趋势中国——在习近平的指导下——已经转移了注意力以及焦点?#28966;?#22266;其在九段线的存在感而中国东海曾经作为一个备受关注的地区已经隐居幕后了今年春季菲律宾提出的关于九段线合法性的诉?#20064;?#20214;将会在海牙常设国际仲裁法院判决通过许多依据以及中国声明中存在的固有漏洞最终的判决结果很有可能?#19979;?#23612;拉的心意




    ferdinand marcos • 2 days ago
    Who Will Stand Up to China This Year?
    All UN member countries who adhere INTERNATIONAL LAW.

    今年谁会对抗中国
    所有遵守国际法的联合国成员



    ting_m_1999 ferdinand marcos • a day ago
    Who Will Stand UP to America, the Dictatorial Tyrant, This Year?

    回LS今年谁会对抗美国这个独裁暴君



    ferdinand marcos ting_m_1999 • a day ago
    The China Communist Party headed by Pres. Xi of PROC. and North Korea.

    回LS中国和朝鲜



    A Chinese Sannie Evan Malala • 17 hours ago
    The nine-dashed-line is a fact, even the Pinoy admits its existence as you have attested; you cannot call a fact a lie, by calling a fact a lie means you are lying and you are a liar lying to cover Pinoy's stealing.

    回LS九段线是实际存在的事实就像你自己也说的即使是菲律宾也承认其存在你不能把一个真实存在的事实称为一个谎言而通过你这种把事实称为谎言的说法那意味着你本身就是个大骗子而且试图用谎言来掩盖菲律宾?#30331;?#30340;行为



    Pits A Chinese • 17 hours ago
    china’s territorial claims, based upon a 1947 map showing nine dashed lines encircling the SCS, has NO legitimate basis...NOT recognize by the international community..then or now..there is absolutely NO HISTORICAL basis to support either of the dash-line claims..Chiang Kai-Shek’s 9 or 11 dash line declaration is nothing but a gigantic historical fraud..its nothing but a sole declaration made by china which nobody recognizes or acknowledges.,,its not a treaty or something the world is compelled to abide or accept or believed..nor is it binding to anyone..

    回LS中国领土声明的依据是?#29615;?#23637;示九段线包含了南海诸礁岛的1947年的地图而这依据是完全不合法的...也不被国际社会承认...无论是当时还是现在...中国?#24049;?#26080;任何历史依据来支持其九段线声明...蒋委员长的9或11段线的宣告就是一个巨大的历?#33778;?#35784;...这就是?#29615;?#27809;有任何人承认的仅仅中国单方面的宣告这九段线根本就不是一个世界必须去遵守或者接受或者相信...或者一个对任何人都有?#38469;?#21147;的协议或?#35009;?#19996;西



    Merlion Economist ferdinand marcos • a day ago
    Rule of law is only law for non Super Powers. ie. the small players.
    Don't you know your history.
    PH are really flogging a dead horse with this one. Same judgement that got them no where in the past.

    讲法律对小国家是要讲法律超级大国可不需要
    你不了解历史啊
    菲律宾这一次实际上是做无用功一直以来这样的法律判决对他们中国来说都没有?#35009;丛际?#21147;的



    ferdinand marcos Merlion Economist • a day ago
    merlion of singapore or native chinese hiding in singapore.
    No one is above the Law, unless it's a Living type of Law.
    China's way of STRATEGY in defending a BOGUS CLAIM is a waste of effort on something when there is no chance of succeeding, that is the definiton of flogging a dead horse.
    Changing a strategy is the best solution, in face of a looming UNFORESEEN LEGAL REPERCUSSION.
    How about trillions of Dollars?
    When there is money, money comes.
    China got money, and China will Pay Big Time!

    楼上是?#24405;?#22369;人或者隐藏在?#24405;?#22369;的中国人没有人可以凌驾在法律之上除非是生活类型的法律中国维护自己无效主权声明的战略根本是在做无用功不可能成功的改变战略才是最好的解决方案否则将受到法律的制裁



    Merlion Economist ferdinand marcos • 20 hours ago
    Makes no difference if you are Chinese Singaporean or native chinese in Singapore cause the only difference is a generation or two. Their still essentially made up of the same superior genetics that gets you Top on the PISA ranking.
    No one is above the law unless its international law. Then theres a pecking order.
    Thats just realism. That realism allows for the US to dominate the PH when it did.
    Bogus claim is still a claim. Now if its the US that just came into Asia and said this island is mine like they did with Hawaii then yeah its bogus. But since there were chinese fishermen in the SCS that were named after them and Chinese in PH, then there is a linkage that helps legitimize the claim.
    But at the end of the day, its guns that sort out claims, not law.
    Sorry.

    不管是?#24405;?#22369;华人还是在?#24405;?#22369;的中国人都是差不多的差别也只是先来后到一两代人而已?#23616;?#19978;他们都是拥有相同的?#21028;?#22522;因这也使?#30431;?#20204;在pisa测试中的成绩居于前?#23567;?

    法律不能无视除非是国际法那里是讲的是丛?#22336;?#21017;
    这就是现实在现实中美国就能主宰菲律宾的一举一动

    无效声明也是一种声明今天如果美国人来到亚洲说这个岛是美国的就像他们攫取夏威夷曾用的?#22336;?#37027;么这就是伪造的声明但是如果岛上先有中但是南中国海有中国渔民名字也是根据中国来命名而且菲律宾也有华人所以中国的声明是合法的但是最终还是靠枪炮来解决而不是靠法律能解决得了的悲伤



    ferdinand marcos Merlion Economist • 18 hours ago
    Big words, like big guns.
    A native chinese with an identity crises, flaunts his superior genes. hahhahha.......
    A native chinese in a city republic, like mainland china flaunts it's untested military personnel or hardwares...hahahaha
    plain and simple
    If you got a gun big or small, might as well use.
    Guns are not for show, you show it, use it.
    In Phil., guns are kept it's not for show.
    Philippine intends with constant reminder by it's friends to be civilize. In civilize world, Law is better than guns, but if the other party does not recognized Law, but only guns then, might as well respond the same.
    As for your native land china till this present time, the US navy has been challenging those fearfull weapons of China's Peoples Liberation Army or Navy.
    Has China RESPONDED THE CHALLENGE?

    大嘴如放屁
    土著中国人不知道自己几斤几两了在这了炫耀?#35009;?#20248;良基因哈哈.......
    土著中国佬大陆人炫耀他们那些经不起考验的军队和军队装备哈哈哈脑残加无知
    你有大炮那打出来啊
    大炮是?#32654;?#28843;耀的你有就打出来
    在菲律宾大炮不是?#32654;?#25670;设的
    菲律宾人经常说要做一个文明人在文明世界讲的是法律而不是暴力但是如果有人?#27425;?#25991;明只?#24230;?#22836;我便战
    土著中国佬嚣张?#35009;?#21834;美军已经挑战中国人民解放军或海军的那些“可怕”武器直到现在中国佬有敢吱一声吗



    Merlion Economist ferdinand marcos • 17 hours ago
    I thought I was trying to keep it simple stupid with Big Guns, rather than long range highly mobile missile platform. I wasn't sure if the Filo could understand me.
    The smart thing about the chinese is that they don't have to use their guns. Still get what they want like scarbrough shaol.
    Has china responded to the challenge. Yes! by reclaiming islands and building runways and putting missile batteries on it.
    US temporary. China permanent.

    我想简单的大炮是没?#35009;?#20294;长程导弹的高机动发射平台可不是说笑的不知道菲律宾?#22235;?#21542;理解这一点
    妙的是中国不需要使用?#35009;?#22823;炮仍然能拿到他们想要的黄岩岛
    中国敢吱一声吗 废话重?#24459;?#26126;岛屿的主权在岛上大建跑道设置导弹这算不
    美国挣得一时中国挣得一世


    更多
    评论加载中
    我还要发表看法
    "看世界"温馨提醒
    1请勿发表违反国家法律评论评论请文明用语
    2禁止发布广告评论
    匿名发表  用户名: 密码: 验证码:

    浏览过本页的网友还关注
    美国译帖 - 热门推荐
    第一赞助商
    双语美文 - 阅读榜
    第二赞助商
    美国译帖 - 最新收录
    第三赞助商
    国外?#21028;?#35770;坛 - 为您推荐
    第四赞助商
    经验分享 - 阅读榜
    ?#38431;?#29233;好网帖翻译的朋友加入我们
    QQ?#28023;?07195648
    联系邮箱[email protected]
    无觅关联推荐快速提升流量
    ֻ